Six apps we are proud to open with
The week one seed listings, why each one is here, and the primary source behind every claim. Two credibility anchors, three indie proofs, one tool you will use today.
Browse by category
All categoriesBrowse by platform
All platformsResources
Latest postsBlog
A curated launch directory for apps that actually ship, on every platform including the ones nobody else lists. Here is what it is, who it is for, and how to get in.
There are plenty of places to launch an app. Most of them share the same shape: a daily feed, a leaderboard, a paid queue skip, and a listing page that goes quiet the day after your launch. We built applauncher.dev because the interesting part of a launch is not the day. It is the page that is still there a year later, still getting found, still sending people to your product.
applauncher.dev is a curated launch directory. You submit an app, a human reviews it against a published bar, and approved apps launch into a dated feed and then live on permanently as a structured listing. That listing feeds category pages, platform pages and best-of roundups, so the work you do writing it keeps paying out long after the launch window closes.
Three things make it different from the directories we studied before building this one.
Platform is its own axis. Most directories mix platform and purpose in a single category list, so Chrome Extensions sits next to Marketing and a terminal tool has to pick whichever label fits worst. Here there are twelve categories, nine platforms and a curated tag layer, all independent. Your app can be Developer Tools and CLI and Linux and self-hosted at the same time, and each of those is a real page with real search demand behind it.
The dofollow link is earned, never sold. One competing directory sells a standalone nofollow to dofollow upgrade for five dollars. It is honest about it, and it is also precisely what Google’s link spam policy describes. We do not have that SKU and never will. Outbound links start nofollow on a tracked redirect and turn dofollow when you clear one of three bars: ten upvotes during your launch window, a verified badge live on your own site, or an editor’s pick. Paying moves you up the queue. It does not touch the attribute.
Rejection is predictable. Every reason we would turn a submission down is published in advance with a named code, and a rejected paid submission is refunded in full, automatically, in the same email that carries the reason. Some directories promise that paid launches are never declined. That makes the review theater, and it makes every badge on the site worth less.
Four groups, and we built something specific for each.
Solo developers and indie hackers get distribution without a budget: a free submission that is genuinely reviewed, a launch date inside thirty days, and first-class listings for CLI tools, self-hosted projects and browser extensions rather than a SaaS template with the wrong fields.
Startup product teams get a launch moment they can schedule a sprint around, plus a listing structured for both people and answer engines. Fast Track is reviewed within twenty four hours, which is short enough to commit to a date in a release plan.
App marketers and growth teams get attribution that works. Every outbound link runs through a redirect that appends a referral parameter and counts the click server side, so the traffic shows up in your analytics and in a launch report rather than disappearing into direct.
Agencies and freelancers get a repeatable process: three free tools that front-load the preparation, magic link editing so there is no account sprawl across client projects, and published reason codes so a rejection is a fixable list rather than a mystery.
We are opening with six apps, chosen from a pool of twenty nine verified candidates. Every one of them is flagged as a seed listing, is unclaimed, and is excluded from rankings, because a seeded app sitting on a leaderboard on day one would make the leaderboard worthless.
Two credibility anchors, three indie or small-team proofs that craft is what gets you in, and one tool our audience will start using the same afternoon. The rest of the pool arrives in batches of four or five a week, which keeps the directory looking alive to both crawlers and visitors rather than dumping twenty nine listings on one day and going quiet.
Paste your app’s URL. The server fetches the page and pre-fills your name, tagline, description, logo and images, and detects your platforms from store links, a package manifest or an extension manifest. You edit the draft with no account at all. At the end you enter an email, and clicking the magic link both verifies the email and submits the listing. That same link is your permanent edit link.
What you need before you start: a live and usable product on a domain you control, a landing page that explains what it does, a working install or signup path, at least one real screenshot, and three to eight written features. What we do not list: waitlists, directories, templates, boilerplates, courses, ebooks, affiliate resale sites and vaporware.
Free submissions get a launch date fourteen to thirty days out. If the queue ever starts stretching, we add slots rather than letting the wait grow, because a free tier with a six month line is not a free tier.
Read the submission guidelines before you write anything, run your landing page through the OG and meta tag checker, then submit your app. We will read it.
Keep reading
The week one seed listings, why each one is here, and the primary source behind every claim. Two credibility anchors, three indie proofs, one tool you will use today.
Every launch directory we benchmarked collapses platform into its category list, so terminal tools and self-hosted software land in the wrong bucket. Here is the fix.
The quality bar, the thirteen named reason codes, what happens at each step of the queue, and the refund rule that applies when we decline a paid submission.